Comparison of Anxiety levels among Medical & Engineering Students
Abstract
Background: Medical and Engineering educational programs are widespread and difficult, which frequently leads to anxiety. The basic objective of this study was to compare the anxiety levels among medical & engineering students.
Methodology: A cross sectional study was carried out among students of different medical & engineering universities of Karachi from August 2018 to February 2019. A simple stratified sampling technique was used, 250 medical students and 150 engineering students including both genders participated in the study. A self-administered questionnaire consisting of socio demographic profile, details on anxiety episodes, causes of anxiety, physical symptoms and ways to overcome anxiety was utilized in this study.
Results: Findings showed that among 250 medical students 160(64%) had anxiety out of which 49% were moderate and 15% were in severe anxiety. On the other hand, 54 (36%) engineering students had anxiety. Social interactions (45%) and university/work (35%) were the prime cause of anxiety as indicated by study population.
Conclusion: Significant differences were shown between medical and engineering students. Our study suggests that medical students experience more anxiety than engineering students.
Downloads
References
2. Mayya, S.S., Rao, A.K., and Ramnarayan, K. (2004). Learning approaches, learning difficulties and academic performance of undergraduate students of physiotherapy. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Science and Practice, 2 (4).
3. Mane AB, Kumar MKK, Paul NC, Shasidhar HG. Differences in perceived stress and its correlates among students of professional courses. J ClinDiagnos Res. 2011;5(6):1228-1233
4. Sarkar D, Saha J. Assessment of Stress among First Year Medical Students of Chhattisgarh. IOSR J Dental Med Sci. 2015:14(8):37-40
5. Manjunath SM, Nagesh RG, Janardhan Singh, Ravish Kumar M. A cross-sectional study on the sources and Levels of stress among second year Undergraduate medical students. National J Med Res. 2014;4(4):314-317
Copyright (c) 2019 The Author

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.