Comparison of psychological well-being and life satisfaction between extended and nuclear family systems among students

Keywords: Psychological Well-being (PWB), Satisfaction with Life (SWL), Extended and Nuclear Family Structure, Gender


Background: The family system affects the mental health and well-being of an individual and significantly alters the satisfaction level. The current study intended to explore the differences in psychological well-being and life satisfaction between the students belong to extended and nuclear family systems.

Methodology: For this comparative study, a sample size of 467 participants (204 male & 263 female) was selected, including 314 participants from the nuclear family system and 153 from the extended family system. The Ryff Psychological Well-being Scale (PWB) and the Diener Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) were used as outcome measuring tools.

Results: The mean PWB scores were 343.45 ± 2.745 for the extended family system and 339.67 ± 1.90 for the nuclear family system. The mean score of satisfaction with life was 1.05 ± 5.64 for the extended family system, and the mean score for the nuclear family system was 1.05 ± 5.60 while (t=1.907). Moreover, women's PWB means the score was 343.71 ± 29.57, and men's PWB mean score was 333.80 ± 37.35. While the score of satisfaction with women's life was 22 ± 5.75, and the men's score was 22.58 ± 5.46.

Conclusion: Results show no significant mean difference in the psychological well-being of participants of nuclear and extended family systems. Similarly, no significant difference was found in satisfaction with life between both family systems. Gender difference in PWB was found as women scored higher than men, while there was no gender difference among students in satisfaction with life.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Gul N, Shah A, Alvi SM, Kazmi F, Ghani N. Family system’s role in the psychological well-being of the children. Khyber Med Univ J. 2017;9(1):29-32.
2. Chen J, Chen S, Landry PF. Urbanization and mental health in china: linking the 2010 population census with a cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(8):9012-9024.
3. Amato PR, Keith B. Parental divorce and adult well-being: A meta-analysis. J Marriage Fam. 1991;53(1):43-58.
4. Edwards SD, Ngcobo HS, Pillay AL. Psychological well-being in South African university students. Psychol Rep. 2004; 95(3_suppl):1279-1282.
5. Macleod AK, Moore R. Positive thinking revisited: Positive cognitions, well‐being and mental health. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: Int J Theory & Practice. 2000;7(1):1-0.
6. Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(6):1069.
7. Falci CD. The effects of family structure and family process on the psychological well-being of children: From the children's point of view (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech). 1997:1-56
8. Helson R, Srivastava S. Three paths of adult development: Conservers, seekers, and achievers. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;80(6):995.
9. David H, Demo DH, Acock AC. Family structure, family process, and adolescent well-being. J Res Adolesc. 1996;6(4):457-488.
10. Diener, E. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol. 2002;55:34–43.
How to Cite
Jahan, K., & Ali, S. (2021). Comparison of psychological well-being and life satisfaction between extended and nuclear family systems among students. Annals of Psychophysiology, 8(2), 62-70.