Open diaphyseal fracture of the tibia in Pakistani adults: A comparative study of Plaster of Paris cast vs. Naseer Awais external fixator.

  • Beesham Kumar Department of Orthopedics, Liaquat University Health Sciences Jamshoro-Pakistan.
  • Irshad Bhutto Department of Orthopedics, Liaquat University Health Sciences Jamshoro-Pakistan.
  • Syed Muhammad Ali Department of Orthopedics, Liaquat University Health Sciences Jamshoro-Pakistan.
  • Ashok Kumar Department of Orthopedics, Liaquat University Health Sciences Jamshoro-Pakistan.
  • Siraj Ahmed Butt Department of Orthopedics, Liaquat University Health Sciences Jamshoro-Pakistan.
  • Abass Memon Department of Orthopedics, Liaquat University Health Sciences Jamshoro-Pakistan.
  • Iftikhar Ahmed Memon Department of Orthopedics, Liaquat University Health Sciences Jamshoro-Pakistan.
  • Ali Yasir The Searle Company Limited, Karachi-Pakistan.
Keywords: Open Fracture, Naseer Awais External Fixator, Plaster of Paris, Tibia.

Abstract

Background: The management of open tibial diaphyseal fractures is the most challenging glitch faced by orthopedic surgeons. For open or comminuted fractures, external fixation remains the gold standard. This study aimed to assess the treatment response of fixators by comparing the results of open diaphyseal tibial fracture stabilization in adults by Plaster of Paris (POP) cast versus Naseer Awais External Fixator (NAEF).

Methodology: A single-center, prospective study was conducted at the leading teaching institute and tertiary care hospital of Jamshoro and Hyderabad, Pakistan. A total of 30 patients having an open diaphyseal fracture of the tibia were randomly assigned to two groups (Group A-POP cast and Group B to NAEF; n=15 each). Duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications (like wound infection, union rate, and functional outcome) were compared between groups.

Results: On average, group A patients stayed in the hospital for 3.65 weeks, while group B patients stayed for 2.49 weeks (p=0.004). Wound infections were observed in 26.7% and 53.3% of the patients in group A and B, respectively. No significant difference in the adequate callus formation (i.e. union) and good functional outcome was observed among patients of group A and B (p>0.05).  

Conclusion: The use of NAEF for open diaphyseal fractures of the tibia has a significant advantage over POP cast in reducing the duration of hospital stay. However, no significant differences were observed in wound infection, union rate and time, and functional outcome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Lua JY, Tan VH, Sivasubramanian H, Kwek EB. Complications of open tibial fracture management: risk factors and treatment. Malays Orthop J. 2017;11(1):18-22.
2. Thakore RV, Francois EL, Nwosu SK, Attum B, Whiting PS, Siuta MA, Benvenuti MA, Smith AK, Shen MS, Mousavi I, Obremskey WT. The Gustilo‚ÄďAnderson classification system as predictor of non-union and infection in open tibia fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017;43(5):651-656.
3. Marongiu G, Dolci A, Verona M, Capone A. The biology and treatment of acute long-bones diaphyseal fractures: Overview of the current options for bone healing enhancement. Bone Reports. 2020;12:100249.
4. Hannigan GD, Pulos N, Grice EA, Mehta S. Current concepts and ongoing research in the prevention and treatment of open fracture infections. Adv Wound Care. 2015;4(1):59-74.
5. Diwan A, Eberlin KR, Smith RM. The principles and practice of open fracture care, 2018. Chin J Traumatol. 2018;21(4):187-192.
Published
2021-05-04
How to Cite
Kumar, B., Bhutto, I., Ali, S. M., Kumar, A., Butt, S. A., Memon, A., Memon, I. A., & Yasir, A. (2021). Open diaphyseal fracture of the tibia in Pakistani adults: A comparative study of Plaster of Paris cast vs. Naseer Awais external fixator. International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research (IJEHSR), 9(2), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.29052/IJEHSR.v9.i2.2021.223-231