Attitude and practice regarding effective blood pressure measurement among health professionals at a tertiary care hospital in Hyderabad - Pakistan

  • Rabail Zaman Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, LUMHS Research Forum
  • Sobia Anam Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, LUMHS Research Forum
  • Muhammad Muneeb Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, LUMHS Research Forum
  • Sabry Ashraff Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, LUMHS Research Forum
Keywords: Blood pressure, Tertiary care hospital, Healthcare professionals, Blood pressure measurement

Abstract

Background: Blood pressure (BP) measurement is one of the basic indicator used for the diagnosis, treatment and research investigations of Hypertension. The accuracy of the measurements have the potential to influence the decision making and therefore is a prerequisite, regardless of which technique is used. Still, too often the accuracy of measurement is taken for granted in general practice. This study aims to gauge the attitude and practice of health professionals regarding effective BP measurement at a tertiary care hospital.

Methodology: This cross-sectional study comprised of 50 healthcare professionals, chosen via purposive sampling from Liaquat University Hospital, a tertiary care hospital at Jamshoro, Hyderabad during November, 2015 to January, 2016. A self-administered structured qualitative and quantitative questionnaire was used to evaluate the attitude and practice of effective BP measurement. The data was analyzed through SPSS version 19 and Microsoft Excel.

Results: According to the study results, 88% of the participants had clinical experience of up to 5 years. Around 56% of the respondents rated their BP measurement skills as very good, 38% as good while 6% as acceptable. It was found that 46% of the respondents use to measure BP only once whereas 54% do it twice to get a mean value. For the location of measuring the BP, 60% responded to use only one arm while, 40% reported to measure it from both arms. Furthermore, many of the respondents reported for never attending any Continuous Medical Education (CME) regarding BP measurement along with the 48%, who declared that they had never updated their knowledge regarding BP measurement guidelines.

Conclusion: It is evident from the survey that selected set of healthcare professionals had lesser focus toward accurate methods of BP measurement as well as low interest in updating their knowledge regarding the standard protocols. It is concluded that up gradation of knowledge and awareness reading standard and current practices must be taught regularly and must be mandatory to follow for all healthcare providers.

Author Biography

Sobia Anam, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, LUMHS Research Forum

Lecturer at Liaqaut University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro

References

1. Villegas I, Arias IC, Botero A, Escobar A. Evaluation of the technique used by health-care workers for taking blood pressure. Hypertension. 1995; 26(6):1204-1206.
2. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005;111(5):697-716.
3. Martiniuk AL, Lee CM, Lawes CM, Ueshima H, Suh I, Lam TH, Gu D, Feigin V, Jamrozik K, Ohkubo T, Woodward M. Asia-Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration, Hypertension: its prevalence and population-attributable fraction for mortality from cardiovascular disease in the Asia-Pacific region, J Hypertens. 2007; 25 (1):73-79.
4. World Health Report 2002: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2002
5. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, AlMazroa MA, Amann M, Anderson HR, Andrews KG, Aryee M. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2224-2260.
Published
2019-06-01
How to Cite
Zaman, R., Anam, S., Muneeb, M., & Ashraff, S. (2019). Attitude and practice regarding effective blood pressure measurement among health professionals at a tertiary care hospital in Hyderabad - Pakistan. International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research (IJEHSR), 7(2), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.29052/IJEHSR.v7.i2.2019.101-107